-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 320
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: fix some function names in comment #4137
Conversation
Signed-off-by: linchizhen <[email protected]>
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications across three files in the codebase. In Changes
Suggested Labels
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🔇 Additional comments (3)x/blobstream/types/msgs.go (1)Line range hint The rename from ✅ Verification successfulLGTM! Method name and implementation correctly align with the sdk.Msg interface pattern The verification confirms that:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Verify that the method implements the sdk.Msg interface correctly
ast-grep --pattern 'interface sdk.Msg {
$$$
GetSigners() []sdk.AccAddress
$$$
}'
Length of output: 88 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for sdk.Msg interface definition
rg "type Msg interface" -A 5
# Search for any other GetSigners method implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($_ $_) GetSigners() []sdk.AccAddress'
# Search for imports to verify sdk package usage
rg "sdk\." x/blobstream/types/msgs.go
Length of output: 2182 x/blobstream/abci_test.go (1)
The rename from test/util/test_app.go (1)
The comment update from Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Congrats, your important contribution to this open-source project has earned you a GitPOAP! GitPOAP: 2024 Celestia Contributor: Head to gitpoap.io & connect your GitHub account to mint! Learn more about GitPOAPs here. |
Overview
fix some function names in comment